Discussion: View Thread

EGOS Conference Sub-theme on Comparing Organizations: New Approaches to Using Case Study, Small-N, and Set-Theoretical Methods

  • 1.  EGOS Conference Sub-theme on Comparing Organizations: New Approaches to Using Case Study, Small-N, and Set-Theoretical Methods

    Posted 11-05-2007 19:30

    We would like to draw your attention to a sub-theme for the upcoming EGOS confernce in <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Amsterdam</st1:place></st1:city>. Details on this track as below; the deadline for submisson of proposals is January 13, 2008. Our apologies for cross-posting.

     

    24th EGOS Colloquium

    July 10-12, 2008

    <st1:placename w:st="on">Vrije</st1:placename> <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype>, <st1:city w:st="on">Amsterdam</st1:city>, The <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">Netherlands</st1:country-region></st1:place>

     

    Call for Papers for Sub-theme 38

    Comparing Organizations: New Approaches to Using Case Study, Small-N, and Set-Theoretical Methods

     

    Submissions:  Please submit an abstract of 800 words or less by the deadline of January 13, 2008.  Details of making your submission on-line can be found here:

    http://www.egosnet.org/conferences/sub_guidelines.shtml

     

    Convenors:

    Gregory Jackson
    King's College London (UK)
    gregory.2.jackson@kcl.ac.uk

    <st1:placename w:st="on">Ruth</st1:placename> <st1:placename w:st="on">V.</st1:placename> <st1:placename w:st="on">Aguilera</st1:placename>
    <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype> of <st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Illinois</st1:place></st1:state>, Urbana-Champaign (USA)
    ruth-agu@uiuc.edu

     

    Peer C. Fiss
    Marshall School of Business of the <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype>
    of <st1:placename w:st="on">Southern California</st1:placename> (<st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">USA</st1:place></st1:country-region>)
    fiss@marshall.usc.edu

     


    Details of the call for papers

    Organizations are widely conceived as complex systems of interdependent factors, but empirical methodology often poorly reflects such interdependence. For example, standard linear model, such as regression analysis, treat variables as competing in explaining variation in the outcome rather than focusing on how causes may combine in specific cases to create outcomes. Meanwhile, case studies have an important tradition in organizational research, but face the challenge of generalizing across cases or using cases effectively to better 'contextualize' the boundary conditions of existing theories.

    Recently, organization researchers have begun applying comparative research methods to studying 'cases' at the organizational or national level. In particular, a number of newer small-N and set-theoretic methods (Fiss, 2007), such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), have been applied to cross-national data (where N is small) or organizational analysis where causation is complex and there are more than one path to an outcome (e.g. Ragin, 2000). Similarly, case-based comparisons have been used to develop theory and explore causality where conventional statistical methods are too unwieldy (e.g. Eisenhardt, 1989).

    Comparative methods invite application to a wide number of areas of organizational research in order to extend case study research designs or better understand how complex combinations of factors influence organizational outcomes, such as in research on 'varieties of capitalism'(Kogut & Ragin, 2006), comparative corporate governance (Aguilera & Jackson, 2003), or business strategy (Kogut, MacDuffie & Ragin, 2004). By understanding organizations as complex 'cases' with historical and contextual uniqueness, we may gain a better understanding about perceived 'best practices' and their potential imitation or adaptation in different settings.

    For this sub-theme, we invite contributions that draw on comparative methods, including but not limited to comparative case studies, small-N, and set theoretical methods. We encourage contributions from a diverse range of empirical fields, including both macro-institutional analyses of organizations in different countries and micro-analyses of firms. We invite submissions that reflect (but are not limited to) the following sorts of questions:

    • What is the current state of the art of comparative case study and small-N analysis, and how might these be applied to studying organizations?
    • What is a case, and what does case-based research in particular contribute to our understanding of organizations?
    • What are synergies between comparative methods and standard statistical analyses? How can both be complementary?
    • How can comparative approaches – particularly using QCA – be made more dynamic and take into account temporal processes?
    • How can comparative analysis usefully be combined with narrative approaches that focus on culture and discourse?
    • How can the comparative method reflect back onto and inform theory? What theoretical approaches – such as institutional theory, business systems theory, the resource-based view, frame analysis, or network theory – could benefit more from applying a comparative approach?
    • Empirical applications of comparative methods in organization research, to topics such as corporate governance, international management, strategic alliances, entrepreneurship, or human resource management.


    Key readings

    Aguilera, R.V. & G. Jackson (2003): The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants. <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">Academy</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Management</st1:placename></st1:place> Review, 28: 447-465.

    Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research. <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">Academy</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Management</st1:placename></st1:place> Review, 14: 532-550.

    Fiss, P.C. (2007): A Set-Theoretic Approach to Organizational Configurations. <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">Academy</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Management</st1:placename></st1:place> Review, 32: 1180-1198.

    Kogut, B., J.P. MacDuffie & C.C. Ragin (2004): Prototypes and Strategy: Assigning Causal Credit Using Fuzzy Sets. European Management Review, 1: 114-131.

    Kogut, B. & C.C. Ragin (2006): Exploring Complexity when Diversity is Limited: Institutional Complementarity in Theories of Rule of Law and National Systems Revisited. European Management Review, 3: 44-59.

    Ragin, C.C. (2000): Fuzzy-Set Social Science. <st1:city w:st="on">Chicago</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">IL</st1:state>: <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Chicago</st1:placename></st1:place> Press.


    About the convenors

    Gregory Jackson is Reader in Comparative Management at King's College London. He received his PhD in Sociology at Columbia University and his concerns the institutional and comparative analysis of corporate governance, particularly in Germany, Japan, the US and UK. For more information, please see:
    http://www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/sspp/mgmt/staff/gregoryjackson.html

    Ruth V. Aguilera is an Associate Professor at the Department of Business Administration at the <st1:placetype w:st="on">College</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Business</st1:placename> and at the <st1:placetype w:st="on">Institute</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Labor</st1:placename> and Industrial Relations at the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Illinois</st1:placename></st1:place> at Urbana-Champaign. She received her PhD in sociology from <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Harvard</st1:placename> <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype></st1:place> and works in the fields of comparative corporate governance, cross-border alliances, social networks, and corporate social responsibility. For more information, please see:
    http://www.business.uiuc.edu/aguilera/default.asp

    Peer C. Fiss is an Assistant Professor of Strategy and Organization at the Marshall School of Business of the <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Southern California</st1:placename></st1:place>. He received his PhD from <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Northwestern</st1:placename> <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype></st1:place>, and has worked on corporate governance, framing, and diffusion of practice, as well as applying set-theoretic methods such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in management, strategy and organizational research. For more information, please see:
    http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~fiss/

     

     

    ----------------

    Peer C. Fiss

    Assistant Professor of Strategy

    USC-Marshall School of Business

    Hoffman Hall 521

    <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Los Angeles</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">CA</st1:state> <st1:postalcode w:st="on">90089-0808</st1:postalcode>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">USA</st1:country-region></st1:place>

     

    Phone  213-821-1471

    Fax      213-740-3582

     

    URL     http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~fiss/

     

     
    ----------------
    Peer C. Fiss
    Assistant Professor of Strategy
    USC-Marshall School of Business
    Hoffman Hall 521
    <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Los Angeles</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">CA</st1:state> <st1:postalcode w:st="on">90089-0808</st1:postalcode>, <st1:country-region w:st="on">USA</st1:country-region></st1:place>
     
    Phone  213-821-1471
    Fax      213-740-3582