Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Structural embeddedness = Structural Constraint ?

    Posted 02-06-2013 05:32

    Bonjour,

     

    Appreciate if respected members of this community could advise whether two constructs represent the same network characteristic i.e. whether common third party ties (Gulati & Gargiulo, 1999; Polidoro, Ahuja, & Mitchell, 2011) and structural constraint (Burt, 1992) represent the same network characteristics.

     

    Response is highly appreciated.

     

     

    Best Regards,

     

    Naeem ASHRAF
    Doctorant en Science de Gestion
    CERGAM
    Université d'Aix-Marseille III

    KEDGE Business School (Euromed Management),

    Marseille,

    France

     



    -------------
    Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers attachés qu'il contient sont confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage des destinataires sauf erreur de saisie (si vous le recevez par erreur, merci de le retourner). La publication, l'usage, la distribution, l'impression ou la copie non autorisée de ce message et des attachements qu'il contient sont strictement interdits.
    The information contained in this electronic message may be legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the recipient of this message is not the above-named intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the senders and purge the communication immediately without making any copy or distribution.

    --


  • 2.  Structural embeddedness = Structural Constraint ?

    Posted 02-06-2013 12:09
    The following explanation of network structural embeddedness and constraint comes from my University of Kentucky colleague, Ajay Mehra. I am simply the delivery boy.

    Wally Ferrier

    *********************
    The notion of structural embeddedness is often traced to Granovetter's (1985) AJS piece, in which he argued against, on the one hand, the "undersocialized" or atomized view of economic action and the "oversocialized" (driven by internalized societal norms) view on the other. Granovetter's paper can be read as an exhortation to take the social relations among economic actors seriously in understanding why they do what they do. 


    The concept of structural constraint was elaborated in Burt (1992). The general idea here is that an actor is constrained to the extent that the actor's contacts are themselves interconnected. Burt (1992) presents several different measures to get at this concept empirically-- e.g., his network constraint measure, effective size, etc. The extent to which one's contacts' contacts are interconnected will tend to be positively related to structural constraint, but there is more than one way to measure the concept of constraint.
    *********************
    On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Ashraf Naeem <Naeem.Ashraf@euromed-management.com> wrote:

    Bonjour,

     

    Appreciate if respected members of this community could advise whether two constructs represent the same network characteristic i.e. whether common third party ties (Gulati & Gargiulo, 1999; Polidoro, Ahuja, & Mitchell, 2011) and structural constraint (Burt, 1992) represent the same network characteristics.

     

    Response is highly appreciated.

     

     

    Best Regards,

     

    Naeem ASHRAF
    Doctorant en Science de Gestion
    CERGAM
    Université d'Aix-Marseille III

    KEDGE Business School (Euromed Management),

    Marseille,

    France

     



    -------------
    Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers attachés qu'il contient sont confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage des destinataires sauf erreur de saisie (si vous le recevez par erreur, merci de le retourner). La publication, l'usage, la distribution, l'impression ou la copie non autorisée de ce message et des attachements qu'il contient sont strictement interdits.
    The information contained in this electronic message may be legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the recipient of this message is not the above-named intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the senders and purge the communication immediately without making any copy or distribution.

    --



    --
    ___________________________________
    Walter J. Ferrier, Ph.D.
    Gatton Endowed Associate Professor of Management
    Gatton College of Business and Economics
    University of Kentucky
    Lexington, KY 40506
    859-257-9326




  • 3.  Structural embeddedness = Structural Constraint ?

    Posted 02-07-2013 12:32
    Reply from Steve Borgatti, University of Kentucky

    I would say the answer is loosely yes, but also that no two authors use these terms in exactly the same way. And it varies by context. Also for some, constraint is a consequence of structural embeddedness. Sometimes structural embeddedness refers to something individuals endure, in which case Burt's constraint measure might be used. Other times structural embeddedness is something experienced by a dyad - my relationship with you is embedded in a series of ties in common such that if I screw you, all of my friends will hear of it.

    Steve


    On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Ashraf Naeem <Naeem.Ashraf@euromed-management.com> wrote:

    Bonjour,

     

    Appreciate if respected members of this community could advise whether two constructs represent the same network characteristic i.e. whether common third party ties (Gulati & Gargiulo, 1999; Polidoro, Ahuja, & Mitchell, 2011) and structural constraint (Burt, 1992) represent the same network characteristics.

     

    Response is highly appreciated.

     

     

    Best Regards,

     

    Naeem ASHRAF
    Doctorant en Science de Gestion
    CERGAM
    Université d'Aix-Marseille III

    KEDGE Business School (Euromed Management),

    Marseille,

    France

     



    -------------
    Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers attachés qu'il contient sont confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage des destinataires sauf erreur de saisie (si vous le recevez par erreur, merci de le retourner). La publication, l'usage, la distribution, l'impression ou la copie non autorisée de ce message et des attachements qu'il contient sont strictement interdits.
    The information contained in this electronic message may be legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the recipient of this message is not the above-named intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copy or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the senders and purge the communication immediately without making any copy or distribution.

    --



    --
    ___________________________________
    Walter J. Ferrier, Ph.D.
    Gatton Endowed Associate Professor of Management
    Gatton College of Business and Economics
    University of Kentucky
    Lexington, KY 40506
    859-257-9326