Discussion: View Thread

  • 1.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-12-2007 12:17

    Hi all,

     

    I'm looking for a way to search for the number of firms (private and public, or just public) that are/were primarily engaged in biotechnology, going back to 1985. Since biotech doesn't have its own SIC or NAICS code I cannot use Compustat or an EDGAR search. I have looked at Bioscan, but I don't think that will work for my purposes because a) it includes a lot of diversified chemical companies that would be hard to characterize as "primarily biotech", and b) it drops companies from the database if the companies no longer exist, so its numbers for earlier years are understated and change depending on when you pull the data. I have also looked at Corptech but its selection process seems a bit ad hoc. I think a text search of the "Business Description" field of the SEC filings might work to identify the publicly-held companies. Disclosure Online (through Lexis Nexis) allows such a search, but is only available for the most recent year (at least in our subscription). I think Compact Disclosure allowed this kind of search and was available for multiple years, but the product has been discontinued. I also checked with the BLS and the Census Bureau, but no luck.

     

    Anyone else already gone through this process and have some lessons to share? Thanks for your help!

     

    -<st1:personname w:st="on">Melissa Schilling</st1:personname>



  • 2.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-12-2007 13:19

    HI Melissa:

    I would contact Lynne Zucker, Michael Darby, or one of their co-authors (and post-docs) who worked on their seminal studies of the birth of biotech enterprises.  One of their papers was published in the American Economic Review (see reference below), which requires authors to release data to interested parties.

    Best regards,

    Don

     

    Reference

     

    Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R, and M. B. Brewer. 1998. Intellectual Human Capital and the

          Birth of <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:country-region w:st="on">U.S.</st1:country-region></st1:place> Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1): 290-306

     

    Dr. Donald Siegel

    Professor of Entrepreneurship and Associate Dean for Graduate Studies

    A. <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:placename w:st="on">Gary</st1:placename> <st1:placename w:st="on">Anderson</st1:placename> <st1:placename w:st="on">Graduate</st1:placename> <st1:placetype w:st="on">School</st1:placetype></st1:place> of <st1:placename w:st="on">Management</st1:placename>

    <st1:placetype w:st="on">University</st1:placetype> of <st1:placename w:st="on">California, </st1:placename><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Riverside</st1:place></st1:city>

    225 <st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">Anderson</st1:place></st1:city> Hall

    <st1:place w:st="on"><st1:city w:st="on">Riverside</st1:city>, <st1:state w:st="on">CA</st1:state> <st1:postalcode w:st="on">92521</st1:postalcode></st1:place>

    Tel: (760) 834-0593

    Tel: (951) 827-4996

    Fax: (951) 827-3970

    Fax: (760) 834-0796

    e-mail: donalds@ucr.edu

    http://www.agsm.ucr.edu/index2.php?content=faculty/staff/don.html

    http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/psi32.htm

    http://ssrn.com/author=33607

    Editor-Journal of Technology Transfer

    http://www.springer.com/west/home/business?SGWID=4-40517-70-35751012-detailsPage=journal

    http://heckmann.ucr.edu/

    **************************

    > 


    From: <st1:personname w:st="on">Business Policy and Strategy List</st1:personname> [mailto:BPS-NET@AOMLISTS.pace.edu] On Behalf Of Melissa A. Schilling
    Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 9:17 AM
    To: BPS-NET@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    Subject: Biotech firms

     

    Hi all,

     

    I'm looking for a way to search for the number of firms (private and public, or just public) that are/were primarily engaged in biotechnology, going back to 1985. Since biotech doesn't have its own SIC or NAICS code I cannot use Compustat or an EDGAR search. I have looked at Bioscan, but I don't think that will work for my purposes because a) it includes a lot of diversified chemical companies that would be hard to characterize as "primarily biotech", and b) it drops companies from the database if the companies no longer exist, so its numbers for earlier years are understated and change depending on when you pull the data. I have also looked at Corptech but its selection process seems a bit ad hoc. I think a text search of the "Business Description" field of the SEC filings might work to identify the publicly-held companies. Disclosure Online (through Lexis Nexis) allows such a search, but is only available for the most recent year (at least in our subscription). I think Compact Disclosure allowed this kind of search and was available for multiple years, but the product has been discontinued. I also checked with the BLS and the Census Bureau, but no luck.

     

    Anyone else already gone through this process and have some lessons to share? Thanks for your help!

     

    -<st1:personname w:st="on">Melissa Schilling</st1:personname>



  • 3.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-12-2007 13:37

    Melissa,

    I believe that Compustat also uses the GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) from Morgan Stanley. Code 3520 picks up Pharma, Biotech and Life science. Code 352010 is just biotech defined as "Companies primarily engaged in the research, development, manufacturing and/or marketing of products based on genetic analysis and genetic engineering.  Includes companies specializing in protein-based therapeutics to treat human diseases."  I don't remember if Compustat goes to that level.  I would also be interested in what others have found on this issue.

    Hope that helps.

    Stuart

    Stuart Napshin, PhD Candidate, Drexel Univ

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: "Melissa A. Schilling" <mschilli@STERN.NYU.EDU>

    Date: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:16 pm

    Subject: Biotech firms

    > Hi all,
    >
    >
    >
    > I'm looking for a way to search for the number of firms (private
    > and public,
    > or just public) that are/were primarily engaged in biotechnology,
    > going back
    > to 1985. Since biotech doesn't have its own SIC or NAICS code I
    > cannot use
    > Compustat or an EDGAR search. I have looked at Bioscan, but I
    > don't think
    > that will work for my purposes because a) it includes a lot of
    > diversifiedchemical companies that would be hard to characterize
    > as "primarily
    > biotech", and b) it drops companies from the database if the
    > companies no
    > longer exist, so its numbers for earlier years are understated and
    > changedepending on when you pull the data. I have also looked at
    > Corptech but its
    > selection process seems a bit ad hoc. I think a text search of the
    > "BusinessDescription" field of the SEC filings might work to
    > identify the
    > publicly-held companies. Disclosure Online (through Lexis Nexis)
    > allows such
    > a search, but is only available for the most recent year (at least
    > in our
    > subscription). I think Compact Disclosure allowed this kind of
    > search and
    > was available for multiple years, but the product has been
    > discontinued. I
    > also checked with the BLS and the Census Bureau, but no luck.
    >
    >
    >
    > Anyone else already gone through this process and have some
    > lessons to
    > share? Thanks for your help!
    >
    >
    >
    > -Melissa Schilling
    >
    >



  • 4.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-12-2007 15:07

    Hi,


    I went through this process for my dissertation.  In addition to not having SIC or NAICS codes, the biotech industry has another problem: different surveys pick different companies according to their specialization (i.e. pharmaceutical versus agricultural biotechnology). For example, Bioscan is strongly biased towards pharmaceutical biotechnology companies. There is a good article by Ronald Wirtz in Fedgazette, which you can find online. This article also talks about different surveys about the industry conducted by consulting firms and research organizations.

    Other than Bioscan, there is a web based data company called Recap.com (or rDNA.com). They differentiate between large public firms and small biotech firms (they also have a third category called device firms). A difference from Bioscan is that they also include companies that do not exist anymore and they provide merger, acquisition or bankruptcy information for at least some of the companies that dissolved. They also report whether the company is public or private. You can also use the previous versions of Bioscan to see the differences over time as each Bioscan will only tell you the number of active companies in that particular year. But the company does not keep or sell the old versions, therefore you have to find them from other sources.

    One other source is paper based biotechnology directories. There are different ones.  "Biotechnology Guide USA" has 1988, 1991, 1995, and 1999 versions. "The Biotechnology Directory" starts from 1985 and is repeated in different years.

    I looked at the number of firms that were both in Recap.com and Bioscan and found out that only about 40 percent of the companies are in both databases. The other directories were similar in that sense. The numbers you find will be different depending on which sub-industries you focus or which directories you include. I guess the ideal thing to do would be to join different databases, which will be very time consuming. During my research I come to agree with Ronald Wirtz that there is a strong need to map out the biotechnology industry. I joined Bioscan and Recap.com databases and eliminated the large diversified firms from my sample. I can tell you the number of firms between 1992 and 2003 in my sample if that would be something useful to you.
    Good luck,
    Remzi Gozubuyuk


    Melissa A. Schilling wrote:

    Hi all,

     

    I'm looking for a way to search for the number of firms (private and public, or just public) that are/were primarily engaged in biotechnology, going back to 1985. Since biotech doesn't have its own SIC or NAICS code I cannot use Compustat or an EDGAR search. I have looked at Bioscan, but I don't think that will work for my purposes because a) it includes a lot of diversified chemical companies that would be hard to characterize as "primarily biotech", and b) it drops companies from the database if the companies no longer exist, so its numbers for earlier years are understated and change depending on when you pull the data. I have also looked at Corptech but its selection process seems a bit ad hoc. I think a text search of the "Business Description" field of the SEC filings might work to identify the publicly-held companies. Disclosure Online (through Lexis Nexis) allows such a search, but is only available for the most recent year (at least in our subscription). I think Compact Disclosure allowed this kind of search and was available for multiple years, but the product has been discontinued. I also checked with the BLS and the Census Bureau, but no luck.

     

    Anyone else already gone through this process and have some lessons to share? Thanks for your help!

     

    -<st1:personname w:st="on">Melissa Schilling</st1:personname>



  • 5.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-12-2007 16:01
    Hi,
    I use Research Insight - a product of Compustat. You can look up firms using the GICS. It does go down to 352010. My initial search gave 426 firms. Good luck,
    Roy


    Roy L. Simerly, Ph.D
    Dept of Management
    (252) 328-6632


    ________________________________

    From: Business Policy and Strategy List on behalf of Stuart Napshin
    Sent: Thu 7/12/2007 1:36 PM
    To: BPS-NET@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    Subject: Re: Biotech firms



    Melissa,

    I believe that Compustat also uses the GICS (Global Industry Classification Standard) from Morgan Stanley. Code 3520 picks up Pharma, Biotech and Life science. Code 352010 is just biotech defined as "Companies primarily engaged in the research, development, manufacturing and/or marketing of products based on genetic analysis and genetic engineering. Includes companies specializing in protein-based therapeutics to treat human diseases." I don't remember if Compustat goes to that level. I would also be interested in what others have found on this issue.

    Hope that helps.

    Stuart

    Stuart Napshin, PhD Candidate, Drexel Univ

    ----- Original Message -----

    From: "Melissa A. Schilling" <mschilli@STERN.NYU.EDU>

    Date: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:16 pm

    Subject: Biotech firms

    > Hi all,
    >
    >
    >
    > I'm looking for a way to search for the number of firms (private
    > and public,
    > or just public) that are/were primarily engaged in biotechnology,
    > going back
    > to 1985. Since biotech doesn't have its own SIC or NAICS code I
    > cannot use
    > Compustat or an EDGAR search. I have looked at Bioscan, but I
    > don't think
    > that will work for my purposes because a) it includes a lot of
    > diversifiedchemical companies that would be hard to characterize
    > as "primarily
    > biotech", and b) it drops companies from the database if the
    > companies no
    > longer exist, so its numbers for earlier years are understated and
    > changedepending on when you pull the data. I have also looked at
    > Corptech but its
    > selection process seems a bit ad hoc. I think a text search of the
    > "BusinessDescription" field of the SEC filings might work to
    > identify the
    > publicly-held companies. Disclosure Online (through Lexis Nexis)
    > allows such
    > a search, but is only available for the most recent year (at least
    > in our
    > subscription). I think Compact Disclosure allowed this kind of
    > search and
    > was available for multiple years, but the product has been
    > discontinued. I
    > also checked with the BLS and the Census Bureau, but no luck.
    >
    >
    >
    > Anyone else already gone through this process and have some
    > lessons to
    > share? Thanks for your help!
    >
    >
    >
    > -Melissa Schilling
    >
    >


  • 6.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-12-2007 23:36
    Well, for anyone who cares (and I apologize for wasting the time of the rest
    of you), it looks like using the GICS codes in Compustat works quite well,
    at least in terms of screening out firms that would otherwise be considered
    diversified chemical or traditional pharma. I have no way of knowing offhand
    if other publicly-held biotech companies have been omitted (ironically, I
    let my RECAP subscription lapse about two weeks ago). I have compiled a
    count by year (1985-2005), a list of the companies by year (1985-2005), and
    a frequency distribution of the NAICS codes represented in this list for
    2005. I'm happy to send them to you if you will find them useful.

    -Melissa Schilling
    mschilli@stern.nyu.edu


  • 7.  Biotech firms

    Posted 07-29-2007 21:15
    Melissa,

    You can check on CorpTech (now part of infoUSA, I believe), but be careful using them. I used them for my dissertation in technology innnovation (which included biotech) and had some problems with the data filters. Regardless, the database has been successfully used in both management and marketing research in strategy and innovation.

    Janet Tinoco
    Embry Riddle Aeronautical University

    -----Original Message-----
    From: "Melissa A. Schilling" <mschilli@STERN.NYU.EDU>
    To: BPS-NET@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:16:40 -0400
    Subject: Biotech firms

    Hi all,



    I'm looking for a way to search for the number of firms (private and public,
    or just public) that are/were primarily engaged in biotechnology, going back
    to 1985. Since biotech doesn't have its own SIC or NAICS code I cannot use
    Compustat or an EDGAR search. I have looked at Bioscan, but I don't think
    that will work for my purposes because a) it includes a lot of diversified
    chemical companies that would be hard to characterize as "primarily
    biotech", and b) it drops companies from the database if the companies no
    longer exist, so its numbers for earlier years are understated and change
    depending on when you pull the data. I have also looked at Corptech but its
    selection process seems a bit ad hoc. I think a text search of the "Business
    Description" field of the SEC filings might work to identify the
    publicly-held companies. Disclosure Online (through Lexis Nexis) allows such
    a search, but is only available for the most recent year (at least in our
    subscription). I think Compact Disclosure allowed this kind of search and
    was available for multiple years, but the product has been discontinued. I
    also checked with the BLS and the Census Bureau, but no luck.



    Anyone else already gone through this process and have some lessons to
    share? Thanks for your help!



    -Melissa Schilling


  • 8.  Biotech firms

    Posted 06-09-2008 13:39
    Hi Melissa,

    Hope you are well. I was working on a project with some PhDs looking at
    spinout firms in the pharma/biotech industry. Part of what we are interested
    in examining is the extent to which a progeny firm is similar to the
    'parent' firms that the founders came from. We are thinking we could
    possibly do this by product areas or through patenting activity.

    Any thoughts about sources that would be good for biotech product listings?
    Regarding the patent data, any that you would recommend? (Patent office,
    NBER, Delios)?

    If you have any quick ideas I would love to hear them.

    Thanks!

    Warren


    ____________________________________
    Warren Boeker, Ph.D.
    Douglas E. Olesen Professor of Management
    Chair, Department of Management and Organization
    Michael G. Foster School of Business
    University of Washington

    T: 206.543.8731
    E: wboeker@u.washington.edu
    310 Mackenzie Hall
    Box 353200
    Seattle, WA 98195-3200

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Business Policy and Strategy List [mailto:BPS-NET@AOMLISTS.pace.edu]
    On Behalf Of Melissa A. Schilling
    Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 8:36 PM
    To: BPS-NET@AOMLISTS.pace.edu
    Subject: Re: Biotech firms

    Well, for anyone who cares (and I apologize for wasting the time of the rest
    of you), it looks like using the GICS codes in Compustat works quite well,
    at least in terms of screening out firms that would otherwise be considered
    diversified chemical or traditional pharma. I have no way of knowing offhand
    if other publicly-held biotech companies have been omitted (ironically, I
    let my RECAP subscription lapse about two weeks ago). I have compiled a
    count by year (1985-2005), a list of the companies by year (1985-2005), and
    a frequency distribution of the NAICS codes represented in this list for
    2005. I'm happy to send them to you if you will find them useful.

    -Melissa Schilling
    mschilli@stern.nyu.edu