What kinds of surprising and previously unnoticed phenomena do multimodal methods render accessible? How do multimodal methods help scholars understand known organizational phenomena in new ways?
Which aspects of organizing do multimodal methods not render accessible? How can scholars reduce such blind spots?
What are the specific benefits and drawbacks of different types of multimodal data? Are there interesting but underutilized types of multimodal data?
How can/should organization scholars gain access to and use multimodal data in light of ethical, technical, and other issues and concerns?
How do specific recording procedures and choices enable and constrain research outcomes that are based on multimodal data?
How do established ways of analyzing (qualitative and quantitative) data help scholars make sense of multimodal data, and what are their constraints when applied to multimodal data?
How can scholars analyze multimodal data in new, more innovative ways?
How can scholars present the outcomes of their analyses in journal formats without losing (too much of) the richness of their multimodal data?
For more information, see: https://www.egosnet.org/jart/prj3/egos/main.jart?rel=de&reserve-mode=active&content-id=1499635422149&subtheme_id=1474852913783